The National Midnight Star #1040

Precedence: bulk From: rush@syrinx.umd.edu To: rush_mailing_list Subject: 12/17/94 - The National Midnight Star #1040
** ____ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ** ** / /_/ /_ /\ / /__/ / / / / /\ / /__/ / ** ** / / / /__ / \/ / / / / /__/ / \/ / / /___ ** ** ** ** __ ___ ____ ** ** /\ /\ / / \ /\ / / / _ /__/ / ** ** / \/ \ / /___/ / \/ / /___/ / / / ** ** ** ** ____ ____ ___ ___ ** ** /__ / /__/ /__/ ** ** ____/ / / / / \ ** List posting/followup: rush@syrinx.umd.edu Administrative matters: rush-request@syrinx.umd.edu or rush-mgr@syrinx.umd.edu (Administrative postings to the posting address will be ignored!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The National Midnight Star, Number 1040 Saturday, 17 December 1994 Today's Topics: Krupa and Rich ode to stewart Permanent Waves Inraged with utter jealosey Names on the CP tour Re: 11/30/94 - The National Midnight Star #1029 Re: boring The First Album A Few Things I see red! Ronny baby The Motor Law Album In Feb? Band Re: Neil's CP drum set. and "un-Neil-like-drumming" Barchetta Blues Re: Neil's CP Chops One Bass Drum Red Barchetta's 'Motor Law' Ascii pics Alex Lifeson is my master Re: Neil's drumming as of late. Boring 2 - The Sequel. Greetings from a _FEMALE_ Rush fan! Bass questions Re: NMS#1036 AZ Rush fans rejoice! Mobil Fidelity Favorite Alex solos ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 1994 20:04:55 GMT From: Gregg Jaeger <jaeger@buphy.bu.edu> Subject: Krupa and Rich I want to take this opportunity to let people who liked _Burning for Buddy_ know about an album they'll *love*. (Reading the insleeve of BfB will encourage you to buy this). I just bought _Krupa and Rich_ (from BMG in fact), which is a rerelease of a an album by the two drummers Neil talks about in the BfB insleeve. It is *great*. To see why Neil was into Buddy Rich, and why this is a good album, check this out from the back of _KaR_: "The question was once put squarely to Gene Krupa: 'What do you think of Buddy Rich?' With no hesitation, Krupa replied 'Buddy Rich? I think Buddy Rich is the greast drummer in the world today, bar none. Can I make it more emphatic than that?' "Reverse the scene. Turn the tables. Put Buddy Rich on the spot with the same question. 'You want to know what I think of Gene Krupa? Well, where do you begin? Gene Krupa was the beginning of the end of all jazz drummers. He's a great genius -- a truly great genius of the drums. Gene discovered things that could be done with the drums that hadn't been done before, ever. He discovered these things and made the most of them... I'll tell you about Gene. Before Gene, the drums were in the background, just a part of the band. To put it in plainer terms, the drums didn't have much -- _meaning_. Along comes Gene and the drums take on meaning and they're out of the background. The drummer becomes _somebody_, you know?'" Gregg ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 1994 16:12:13 -0500 From: Mscheid@aol.com Subject: ode to stewart Just thought I'd let Stewart know that Alex is definitely a born again Christian and I did hear it from the HORSE'S MOUTH. So take it easy and stop attacking people. ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 1994 18:55:42 -0500 From: MarSat1@aol.com Subject: Permanent Waves Hi everyone! I wanted to ask a question that I've always wondered about....On Permanent Waves on the first side, there is "Freewill" which talks about how everyone has the freedom to make their own choices. Then on the other side there is "Entres Nous" which talks about relationships. Neil wrote "some we would not chose but we're not always free". I always took the lyrics of both songs to heart(this is my favorite Rush album) and have always been confused about the conflicting concepts of these two songs. Anyone want to comment? Thanks! Marla P.S. Matt in Marseilles-technical difficulties...please stand by! ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 1994 17:41:47 -0700 (PDT) From: FRANSRB@PLU.edu Subject: Inraged with utter jealosey Hello Rush fan's I sure there are a bunch of you who feel this way. As we all know Rush cancelled the Counterparts tour too F@$%ing early. For the people who saw them play from their best album in 10 years I'm very jealos of you guys. (so sue me for poor spelling) If anyone has a bootleg copy of one of their shows, even if it's a lousey show, (imagine that) please let me know Email me at Fransrb@plu.edu. Now that I think of it. I was thinking about putting together all the Rush vidoes ever made. Just one problem though. I haven't got hardly any of the videos. And the videos like Roll the Bones and others that haven't been realesed on video and I didn't have the chance to or the sence to tape them off of MTV. I need two things a list of the videos 'cause I'm not sure which of the abscure ones they have. And I need video's. If you have them email me, my address is above, and I will contact you futher. I would also be happy to disribute the copies, free of charge of course, to anyone who wants one. As long as you send me a blank video tape and a stamped addressed envelope. But I'll get into that when I've finished. RRRRRRRR U U SSSSSS H H ! R R U U S S H H ! R R U U S H H ! RRRRRRR U U SSSSS HHHHHH ! R R U U S H H R R U U S S H H R R UUUUUU SSSSS H H ! Till next year, Ben Frans P.S Hey a great way to study for finals is to listen to every Rush album you own. Which reminds me. gotto go ---------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Names on the CP tour Date: Sat, 10 Dec 1994 22:57:26 -0500 (EST) From: "Adam Paul Loch" <lochadam@student.msu.edu> I believe someone asked about what different names Alex introduced the band as on the CP tour. When I saw them in Auburn Hills, MI, Geddy was Ted Nugent, Neil was Sparky Anderson and Alex was Lee Iacocca. My friend and I were laughing our asses off. When Alex did himself he was like "And I'm umm...umm...uhh...Lee Iacocca!" BTW the whole show was incredible, I wish I would have had better seats, but dosen't everybody? -Ad ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1994 00:30:12 -0800 From: efjose@ucdavis.edu (Wesley Wada) Subject: Re: 11/30/94 - The National Midnight Star #1029 I can sympathize with J. Baker's post a few weeks ago regarding: >"...I doubt i am the only one who is tired of reading five posts about reasons >>why geddy may or may not be jewish, just to get to one interseting post." LOL :-), it broke the monotony for me during my 'rush' scrolling through the NMS with one hand on the delete key as soon as I reach the bottom (yay)! I agree wholeheartedly and each issue I wish for a abbreviated, more informative read but to no avail. I have only been on the list for a few weeks and there is not a issue that goes by that I am 'borderline' ready to send my 'unsubscribe' message. Don't get me wrong, I don't want to change anything for others that are happy and I'm sure it's just a manifestation of their passion for RUSH so I'm just stating my opinion here and I'm going to use FTP and WWW and if the content is more 'pick & choose' there, I will probably unsubscribe and occasionally visit there instead. Also IMHO, with regards to a earlier posting, it's better to receive a single, NMS posting each week rather than all the individual ones, as the Peter Gabriel list was like that and I unsubscribed from it as I receive important business mail and can't be sorting through all that mess...too annoying. Some of the stuff was nice like the recent interview with Alex, FAQ listings of common questions, and some cancer rumor quelling but overall, I was just hoping for a fan resource with new release info, imports, OFFICIAL reviews, fan club news, paraphernalia, and bulletins on Magazine/TV/Radio/online/In-Person appearances for specials (music awards, MTV, etc.) so I wouldn't miss out on the talented dudes. The one good thing that came out of this was a renewed interest in listing to my Rush collection again and I'm trying to appreciate Counterparts more as I only listened to it three times since purchasing it and gave up as I was disappointed compared to Roll The Bones. *Here's my contribution to mindless chatter: I still remember being into Aerosmith, KISS, Thin Lizzy, Rainbow, and Angel back in middle school and the latest Rush release was All The World's A Stage and I bought every release since then. Then ~10 years later, they finally did a long awaited show in Hawaii and anticipating the show, the sponsoring radio station was broadcasting on the day of the show that the lasers were broken and so we only got them with a video wall behind them showing videos of a kid riding on a rocket, a neighborhood, some buildings, flythrough of a high school gym, deliverymen delivering some art to a museum (you know what I'm talking about), all the while fog machines busy onstage... This whole experience reminds me of that SNL episode where the guest host was William Shatner and he does a skit of a Trekkie convention and during his speech, he pauses, looks around the room at the disposition of the audience, and then starts flaming the audience, "people, get a life", "you, how old are you?", "have you ever kissed a girl?" ...[:> ---------------------------------------------------------- From: mfarah@lascar.puc.cl (Miguel Farah F.) Subject: Re: boring Date: Sun, 11 Dec 94 11:37:12 CST >Date: Mon, 5 Dec 94 17:12 GMT >From: bsimpson@cix.compulink.co.uk (Barry Simpson) >Subject: Boring > >"Neils lyrics for Lock & Key are using the incorrect grammer" ^^^^^ >WHO GIVES A SHIT!! They sound good... I think that should be "Neil's" }:-> >At SOR we try to print only FACTS from the horses mouth NOT speculation. Yeah, but speculation usually is much more interesting :-) - MIGUEL FARAH | GCS/O -d+ H s++:+>s++: !g p2+ au- mfarah@lascar.puc.cl (mail only) | a24 w v++ C++ UL+>++++ P+ L>L++ mfarah@ing.puc.cl | 3- E--- N+++ K+++ W--(+) M- V-- http://torvalds.ing.puc.cl/~mfarah | po+ Y+ t++@ !5 !j R G? tv b+ D++ #include <disclaimer.h> | B- e+* u+ h! f+ r-- n---(+) y? ----------------------------------+---------------------------------- "Trust me - I know what I'm doing." - Sledge Hammer ---------------------------------------------------------- Subject: The First Album Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1994 13:40:17 -0500 (EST) From: "Charles Joseph Berch" <berchcha@student.msu.edu> I don't think the first album really sounds too much like Zep or Black Sabbath at all. True, like these bands, they did heavily rely on guitar riffs, but what group doesn't when they first start. I think the first Rush album is actually quit a bit more like some of the other bands that came out at the same time, namely Kiss and Heart. Listen to songs like "In the Mood " and tell me that it doesn't sound like Kiss! Of course, I don't think they were really influence by Kiss or Heart, but rather all three bands independently came up with their own style at the same time. Some of these bands simply became more with time (namely Rush :-)1 ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1994 14:28:12 -0600 (CST) From: Tom Servo <GUNSAUA7823@cobra.uni.edu> Subject: A Few Things I have a few things to address that were brought up in the last NMS. First, the chords given for the beginning of The Trees were wrong, and Alex does NOT play the same riff through the entire first verse--in fact, he changes to a defferent riff when the singing starts. The chords (not tab) are as follows: D - F#(m?) - C#m - A (where the D and G strings are barred on the second fret and the B and E strings are barred on the fifth fret) - E - G (add D) - A - Bm (you figure out the last five chords--if you have the Bm, then you have your fingers where they need to be for all five. My confusion on the F# chord is due to the fact that I'm a drummer who's learning guitar to a RUSH Complete music book, which I don't hav in front of me and I can't remember if a barred F# with the middle finger on the third fret of the G string is a minor or not. Sorry. I'll move on to something I know better... Chris (cdean@mason1.gmu.edu) made a comment on the lack of intricacy in Neil's drumming on Counterparts. Before I address the drumming specifically, first let me point out that the album as a whole was a different musical direction for the whole band--this required something different from every instrument, including drums. I would not, howevre, say that the drumming on CP is less complex by any stretch of the imagination. A few examples... 1. Listen to the bridge section of Animate--hear the off-beat tambourine? Hear the high-toms in between? Now listen to it continue on as the "groove" picks up...this is by no means an easy feat, especially since he appears in concert to be using a trigger controlled by his left foot. 2. Listen to Alien Shore. I quote no specific part here, but if you have to focus on one, try listening to the transitions between verse/chorus, chorus/verse, bridge/chorus, etc., they're nothing to just write off as easy. 3. My personal favorite--Double Agent. Listen to the alternating Ride Cymbal/China Boy where the China Boy is on the odd time (1-3-5) through the first two verses and first half of the bridge and the sweet transition to the second half of the bridge and last verse where the the China Boy is on the even time (2-4-6). Just keeping up the alternating strokes through the whole song is difficult enough, let alone such a smooth transition in the middle of the bridge. No--the drums are not less complex on CP, just different. I might also add that I don't know of any other album where Alex uses a drop-D tuning on his guitar (Stick it Out and *more?*). Listen to the album as a new sound for Rush. It does have some similarities to others, but all in all, it is brand new for them. Next--Arvid Hokanson inquired about whether or not Neil uses a double-kick anymore, and the answer is no. I thought at one time he said he'd never use a double-kick pedal because you lose the dynamic sound of two kicks tuned slightly differently, but he did, in fact switch to a double pedal, and in my humble opinion, it works. (By the way, it was not on this album that he switched, it was several albums ago). To hear it in action, listen to Animate, and the fills before it goes into the chorus. It works, I tell you. Now, finally--a remark of my own. I have yet to hear a Lifeson solo that moves me as much as the solo in The Necromancer off of Caress of Steel--I'm talking about the one right before the "return of prince Bytor"--the one that *wails* for lack of a better word. Favorite Peart fill--the quick little number in the Hyperspace section of Natural Science (Permanent Waves) Favorite Bass line--The whole song, Turn the Page from Hold Your Fire. Thank you and goodnight, Aaron Gunsaulus ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1994 21:00:07 GMT From: Gregg Jaeger <jaeger@buphy.bu.edu> Subject: I see red! >Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 10:09:49 EST >From: John Ambrose <jambrose@eden.rutgers.edu> >Subject: Red Sector A > > This is in response to the recent post about "Red Sector A", and, in >fact, all of Grace Under Pressure having an anti-American theme. I could not >disagree more strongly. I don't think it has an anti-American theme. The p/g tourbook is valuable in understanding the "meaning" of p/g. My impression is that you never read the tourbook, because what it comes down to is that the Cold-War-80's-style was crap. > First of all, the comparisons between "Red Sector A" and Nazi >concentration camps are obvious. However, a fact that is often (and >delibrately) overlooked by the liberal media is that the Communists had >extermination camps which equalled, if not, surpassed the Nazis in >atrocities.[...] All told, Joseph Stalin ALONE exterminated FORTY >MILLION people! The Russian government just admitted to uncovering mass >graves containing up to 200,000 corpses! And, don't forget that these >extermination camps existed long, long after the Nazis were removed from >power. Don't forget Mao and his glorious "cultural revolution"! I couldn't agree more here, I wouldn't say that Neil is concerned only with Communist concentration camps -- he's addressing all such things -- one contemporary example being Serbian ethnic cleansing in Bosnia. > But the point is that the Cold War is over. We won. We can all >sleep better now because, despite the frantic ravings of the Communist >sympathizers in this country (ie, liberals), Ronald Reagan had the courage >and fortitude to face down such bloodthirsty monsters as Andropov, Chernenko, >and Gorbachev. Including Gorbachev here is *quite* unfair. Gorby prepared the way for the peaceable downfall of the Soviet Union -- IMHO, no small achievement. >In the 1980's, it was politically correct to criticize Reagan, and to be >sympathetic to Communism. Neil is not now, nor was he then, a mindless >automaton, waiting to be programmed by the Left. That's true, but he'd also be a mindless automaton if he automatically supported Reagan too. Here's a little analysis of "Red Lenses" to show that he *did* criticize Reagan's position as well as the "Commies": In an interview {\it Guitar} magazine interview of Oct. 1986, Neil Peart said of ``red lenses,'' ``the color red is the theme of [the song],'' and stated that his strategy in writing the songs lyrics was to use that theme as a tool for bringing together a number of ideas through an onslaught of images... The use of a lower case ``i'' character for the pronoun ``I'' alludes to E.E. Cummings, a renowned individualist poet. Here are some lyrics: inside my head and truth is often bitter -- left unsaid said red red thinking about the overhead -- the underfed couldn't we talk about something else instead?'' This stanza contains a play on the old maxim ``the truth is often better left unsaid'' which also its adaption to the present context. ``The pulse to passion'' can be broadly interpreted to mean any sort of emotional reaction, any animalistic urge. This interpretation is reinforced by Peart's evoking of the image of blood at the outset: ``the colour of your heartbeat,'' which is also the colour of ``the battle lost -- or won.'' Peart goes on to introduce another visual image with the phrase ``the rising summer sun'' which also brings to mind the economic battle occurring with the Japan,``Land of the Rising Sun.'' The lyrics continue with the stanzas ``we've got mars on the horizon says the national midnight star (it's true) what you believe is what you are a pair of dancing shoes -- the soviets are the blues -- the reds under your bed lying -- in the darkness dead ahead'' `We've got mars on the horizon/says the national midnight star' can be viewed a sarcastic expression of annoyance with tabloids and the psychology they help foster. The first line could indeed be a headline that might appear such a tabloid, in this case saying `war is imminent' via a reference to Mars, the ancient Greek god of war. This can also be identified as the rally cry of the McCarthy-era's `red scare', the fear of communist infiltration and expansionism (a la Krushchev's `We will bury you'), the latter being recalled by President Ronald Reagan's `Evil Empire' (ca. 1984, the year of the album) characterization of the Soviet Union, which itself was viewed by many to be neo-McCarthyist ``free-world'' propaganda. `The soviets are the blues -- the reds' is a further ground for the interpretation of the central theme, ``red'' as in part a reference to communism. `What you believe is what you are/ a pair of dancing shoes --' can then be seen Peart's put-down of those who are inclined to believe whatever they read in tabloids or of propaganda, saying `it's true' simply because it appears in print -- he portrays such people as puppets, pairs of dancing shoes. `Under your bed/lying --/in the darkness/ dead ahead' is a final fun poke at the paranoid fear of the Russian empire. ``and the mercury is rising the barometer starts to fall you know it gets to us all the pain that is learning and the rain that is burning -- feel red still -- go ahead you see black and white -- and i see red (not blue)'' `The mercury is rising/the barometer starts to fall' can be interpreted to mean events are ``heating up'' and the ``atmosphere is becoming unsettled.'' This is really nice as Mercury, like Mars, is also a member of the pantheon, and mercury is (as we all know) one of the liquids used in thermometers (which, like barometers, monitor weather conditions). As for `you see black and white -- and `i see red/(not blue)', `see[ing] black and white' means believing that the truth of the matter is simple -- the way the paranoid feel that the existence of conspiracies is clear -- and `i see red' is probably Neil's reaction to this simplistic psychology. The `(not blue)' can be seen as an expression of the feeling that the future wasn't so clear and bright (with blue sky) as Reagan supporters thought, but rather was quite uncertain and foreboding (clouds, a falling barometer). E.E. Cummings' opinion of Russia is noteworthy; Cummings said ``Russia, I felt, was more deadly than war; when nationalists hate, they hate merely by killing human beings; when internationalists hate, they hate by categorying and pigeonholing human beings.'' In ``red lenses," Peart brings out in human terms the psychology of the conflict between American nationalism and Russian internationalism. Another thing to keep in mind is that Neil was in the middle of his Dos-Passos-citing period, and Dos was known for most of his life for his independent thinking with regard to the issue of "free market" vs. "planned" economies and their social impact. Gregg ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1994 21:15:19 GMT From: Gregg Jaeger <jaeger@buphy.bu.edu> Subject: Ronny baby >From: OttoPilat <IBMVW2@UNIVSCVM.CSD.SCAROLINA.EDU> >Subject: GUP, Reagan, and the USA > >This is in response to Chris Mahoney's speculation on the meaning of "Red >Sector A." First of all, let me say that you presented a very interesting >argument that made me think quite a bit. But here's what I think. . . > >I don't believe Neil Peart was as anti-Reagan and anti-US as you might think. >This is again only speculation, but here is how I reason it out. Primarily, >I look at the fact that Peart and Reagan both had a common influence, that of >Ayn Rand. Let's also not forget that Rand called Reagan an "imbecile." >Now, the defense build up of the '80s did heighten the tensions of the Cold >War, and I believe that around the time of GUP, the nuclear weapon reduction >talks between the US and USSR had just collapsed. There was definitely a lot >of "Pressure" in the world at that time. > >However, I believe that Peart would put as least as much blame on the USSR as >the USA. Definitely. Gregg ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1994 15:35:52 -0600 From: Mike Silverman <cubsfan@falcon.cc.ukans.edu> Subject: The Motor Law This is in response to jambrose@eden.rutgers.edu's post about "the motor law." I don't want to get political, but a post attcking environmentalists seems out of place, considering that Rush has an environmentalist thread throught their lyrics ("Red Tide", most of the HYF album, "Natural Science", etc). The whole object of those "motor laws" is to force car manufactures to try some alternative fuel automobiles since "the market" by itself isn't. That may be semi-socialistic, but a good idea is a good idea, wheter it be called socialist, capitalist, or whatnot. -- "One likes to believe in the freedom of baseball" - Geddy Lee Internet: cubsfan@falcon.cc.ukans.edu WWW: http://falcon.cc.ukans.edu/~cubsfan/index.html ---------------------------------------------------------- From: Jason Peter <jpeter@thor.ece.uc.edu> Subject: Album In Feb? Date: Sun, 11 Dec 1994 18:45:48 -0500 (EST) I subscribe to new-releases mailing list and I have seen Rush scheduled for a release in February sometime. Can anyone put a stop to this ugly rumor, or is it true (he says hopefully)? Also, are there any plans to tour again in the spring for a 25th tour? Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:21:50 EST From: HI <bolanddt@bigvax.alfred.edu> Subject: Band Okay, my stab, with that 1 a band limit: Lead guitar=Eddie Van Halen simply the best guitarist today Rythm guitar=Scott Ian put done chords for Eddie to go off of Bass guitar=Billy Sheehan he's damn good Drums=Neil Peart a no-brainer, along with Eddie Vocals=Geoff Tate judgement call/taste preference, I like him Keyboards/Piano=Kevin Moore best alternative to Geddy(remember the rule) hope you like it. "I will chooose a path that's clear I will choose Freewill" ps-like that guy's one thing, who cares about speculation, we want facts! ---------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: Neil's CP drum set. and "un-Neil-like-drumming" Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 12:44:20 +0000 (GMT) From: Mr S.P.Bates <mcdaspb@vpx.mcc.ac.uk> In TNMS #1036, Arvid Hokanson (9443740@NESSIE.CC.WWU.EDU) wrote.. >I recently ordered a poster from Ludwig, out of Modern Drummer magazine. >It is a picture of Neil sitting inside his CP drumset. I see that he >only has one bass drum. I thought he has always had two of them, and >Rush didn't come to Seattle this year :(. So could someone tell me if >Neil is using one bass or two, and if one, why. Thank you. I don't know about the CP drumset, because living in the UK means we get to see Rush about once every 4 years. In the UK leg of the RTB Tour (April '92) Neil used a set with 1 bass drum. In the program notes he explains how he wanted to change the layout of his kit. Getting rid of the 2nd bass removed a large empty resonating chamber that he didn't use that often. He opted for another bass pedal onto the 1 remaining bass. I suppose he kept this for the CP tour? While I'm on this subject.....in the same issue, Christopher L Dean wrote about Neil's drumming on RTB and CP being "very un-Neil-like". I suppose it all comes down to what any one person perceives to be "Neil-like". I happen to think that both these albums are very "Neil-like" (whatever that means) : try the end of YBetYLife off RTB. That, like the end of L&K off HYF, is another of those endings to a Rush song that makes hapless amateurs like myself wonder _how does he do that??_ .... _____________________ Simon Bates mcdaspb@vpx.mcc.ac.uk _____________________ ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 10:04:55 EST From: "Mertens, Craig D" <cmertens@ccmail.eo.ray.com> Subject: Barchetta Blues Two weeks before I left for my freshman year in college, my friend Phil Beenhouwer and I were driving from my house to another friend's house to continue a round of going-away parties. It was about 2:00 AM, and as I got to my stylish 1980 Chevy Malibu wagon, he called from his car that "Red Barchetta" was on the radio. This provided all the impetus we needed to ignore the posted speed limit (35 mph). The officer, whose parking lights I noticed a full 2 seconds before he illuminated the night with red and white flashers, informed me that I had been clocked at 52, and Phil and 48. I didn't bother with the Rush plea, though, as he was kind enough to write us both up for the lesser speed. It's been 6 years, and I'm ticket-free since, but it's good to know we're in good company (jeremy@brick.purchase.edu and spod@u.washington.edu). Laughing out loud, Craig ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 9:17:17 -0700 (MST) From: MNW@ALPHA.SUNQUEST.COM Subject: Re: Neil's CP Chops >the drumming on CP is very straight-ahead. In fact, it is very un-Neil-like. >[snip] >If he _is_ doing amazing stuff, will some drummer please enlighten >me and point me to a spot in a song off CP or RTB? Two CP spots I can think of off the top of my head: in Cut to the Chase, during the "Cut - Cut" part, there are some neat fills in the background. Also, during Leave That Thing Alone, there is an awesome fill just before the ride-out, you can't miss it. On RTB, I would draw your attention to the ride-out of Roll the Bones, where there's a fabulous double-bass roll. Also check out the snare fill on Dreamline going into the last chorus, and that tom fill going into the chorus on The Big Wheel. There are probably others that don't come to mind at once, too. Oh yeah, everything on Where's My Thing. In general, CP does have a more basic approach to the drums, as befitting the harder-edged music. That doesn't mean its easy! The beat for Alien Shore contains some hi-hat/ride stuff that I could never play. But the bottom line is, he played what was best for the songs. --Matt Waller mnw@alpha.sunquest.com ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 9:22:11 -0700 (MST) From: MNW@ALPHA.SUNQUEST.COM Subject: One Bass Drum > Dear Rush-ites, >I recently ordered a poster from Ludwig, out of Modern Drummer magazine. >It is a picture of Neil sitting inside his CP drumset. I see that he >only has one bass drum. I thought he has always had two of them, and >Rush didn't come to Seattle this year :(. So could someone tell me if >Neil is using one bass or two, and if one, why. Thank you. One. He's using a slave pedal for his left foot. As for why, I couldn't tell you, but I was glad: it gave me a much better view of what he was doing back there. I saw things I'd never noticed before, like his footwork during Mystic Rhythms--unbelievable! P.S., How's the poster? In concert the drums looked good enough to eat! --Matt Waller mnw@alpha.sunquest.com ---------------------------------------------------------- From: Robert Slaven <ras1@gov.nt.ca> Subject: Red Barchetta's 'Motor Law' Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 10:12:09 MST > There was a recent question on NMS about the Motor Law mentioned in > "Red Barchetta". Again, I'd have to echo the rush-mgr in saying that you'd > really have to refer to the poem on which "Red Barchetta" was based for more > on this. Two things. First, it's actually a short story ('A Nice Morning's Drive') upon which the song is based. Second, the story was written just after Mr Nader came along, and cars started having to add all these safety features. The narrator of the story was trying to drive an old BMW around, but all these 6- ton tanks driving around ('cause that's what the law mandated, so people wouldn't kill themselves in crashes) kept trying to bash him into bits, so he gave up driving. The details of the story and song are quite different, but the principle (totalitarianism trying to protect us from ourselves) is the same. Disclaimer: I actually *agree* with most of the laws re: safety features and higher mpg. I just think it's a shame that we, as a society, are so stupid that we won't act responsibly enough on our own (e.g. driving more safely, driving only when we need to so as not to pollute or waste resources) unless laws are passed. It's our own damn fault, guys! > > However, although "Red Barchetta" takes place in the future, I > maintain that the seeds of the Motor Law have been sown by today's radical > environmentalists. These socialists-in-disguise have consistantly shown a > higher regard for "the environment" than they have for human life. A good > example of this would be legislation requiring automobile companies to comply > with higher and higher mile-per-gallon standards. Since anyone familiar with > rudimentary thermodynamics knows that internal combustion engines can only > achieve an efficiency of 35-45%, the only way to comply with these standards > is to make the cars lighter. > > The result of this self-righteous, misguided legislation is thousands > of more automobile deaths a year -- deaths that could have been prevented if > the victims' cars were heavier and sturdier. But, hey, at least the sky > won't fall now. Grin--read the story! I'm sure it's in the archives--in fact, I think that's where I got it from to read in the first place.... Robert -- --------------------------Robert_Slaven@gov.nt.ca-------------------------- Research Officer, Legislative Assembly of the Northwest Territories, Canada `It's a dead body, Pats.' `Yeah, but is it art, Edi?' Absolutely Fabulous **********Just 'cause I work for 'em doesn't mean I speak for 'em********** ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 16:35:39 GMT From: mr216@greenwich.ac.uk (Russell Marks) Subject: Ascii pics > Also, I second the request for good RUSH Ascii pic's... I think > it would be cool to have one on my plan! Well, I've had this displayed by my .logout for over two years now, you'd need to edit out my junk: ---- ------ - ------- Z - G - E -- D -- -- N --- E - I - L -- -- -- - -- **+ - - -- ---------- * + **++ ------------- --- * + ** + **+ -- - --- * + ** ++ * --- - - --- * * ** + --- - - -- ****** +--- - - - ** *** + + -- - -- - * ** + -- - -- - **** +- - - -- - ** ** +---- - -- -- --- * ** + --- -- ---- * ** + ----- * + *+- --- * - ** - "against the run of the mill * ** static as it seems we break the surface tension *+ with our wild kinetic dreams curves and lines - * -- of grand designs..." - NP I did the CP pacmen and an ascii autostereogram as replacements, but I quite like the starman, so I never actually changed it. I've also got some others I did with pbmtoascii, if anyone's interested... I tried doing the Signals 'Rush' logo, but it didn't work too well: '-, , . ,_ .'____ /^-/_ |_/| _| -:^ ^^--, Hmm. Anyone got any others to contribute? -Rus. -- / : russell marks :: mr216@gre.ac.uk :: speak softly and carry a +6 kitten : \ | GCS -d+ -p+ c++++ l++ u++ e+(*) m+@ s+/++ n--(---) h+(*) f+ !g w+ t+ r- y? | \ ::: "His world is under anaesthetic - subdivided and synthetic" - Rush ::: / ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 13:21:28 EST From: John Ambrose <jambrose@eden.rutgers.edu> Subject: Alex Lifeson is my master Attention all Planets of the Solar Federation... Alex Lifeson is the greatest guitarist of all-time. I'd like to hear Eric Clapton, Jimmy Page, Jeff Beck, Carlos Santana, Steve Vai, Eddie Van Halen, or Jimi Hendrix play "Broon's Bane!" --"laissez faire" ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 10:24:50 -0800 (PST) From: FESSLER@UCSVAX.SDSU.EDU Subject: Re: Neil's drumming as of late. I tend to agree with you. Up to Roll the Bones, he did seem to "fill in the gaps" and make the music seem much more fulfilling. I too noticed the lack of fills, and thought the same thing. I think the only fill that really impressed me (compared with what I know Neil CAN do), was the beginning fill of Alien Shore. ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 94 19:46 GMT From: bsimpson@cix.compulink.co.uk (Barry Simpson) Subject: Boring 2 - The Sequel. I would like to thank everyone for their very great response to my Posting titled "Boring". Most people were completely behind me, but ONE person (you know who you are) was the opposite, he gave me shit for, trying to be Alex. I said in the last boring that I use the same gear as Alex etc. etc. Well I ain't mad enough to blow around 20k on one rack plus about 6k on 4 Marshall Stacks. I use the same makes as Alex, not exact same models, and I only buy one of each *NOT* four. What I'm getting at, I'm not trying to be Alex. I have my own style which is like a Bizar cross between, Alex, Ty Tabor (Kings X) and Dave Gilmour. Hmmm Weird combo. But hey, In the coverband, we play the Rush stuff as close as we can, Because in the UK we don't see Rush over here very often these days. They DON'T play Rush on the radio, we don't even have any rock stations it is *ALL* TOP 40 SHIT. So we have to try and do our best to keep the interest up, thats why in the band we try to keep our current sets close to the ones that Rush to on there Tours. EG this time we do all the songs they did on the CP apart from, Nobody's Hero, TSS, Mystic rhythms, but we do, do Cut To the Chase, Different Stings and Afterimage. Anyway this is getting way long, so I'll go and let you return not your Little Big world. Bye!! Stewart... Thats right I'm not trying to be Alex, Keek. ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 15:58:21 -0500 (EST) From: ANGIR@delphi.com Subject: Greetings from a _FEMALE_ Rush fan! Hello, all!! I finally got caught up on reading my NMSs today.... (I know!!! It's about time!!!) I got behind like 5 issues. So, anyway, please forgive me if any of this is "old news"! First of all, I would like to mention to all the guys (there was probably a note I missed from a girl who has done the same thing... So, don't go thinking that I am picking on only you guys!!) who have written the words to "Ghost of a Chance" or any other song, down and gave them to their girlfriends. When you do that "why not tell the girl that where the words came from?!" It is always best to be yourself, because when you try to be something you are not, it almost always backfires! Second, to the many, many notes about the amazement when you find another FEMALE rush fan. Geeezzzz..... We are out here. Granted, I may not be a fanatic, but I am a Rush fan nonetheless. Give us women some credit here, will ya!!!!! And finally, the issue about "stars who blow off there fans." (I am not going to insert any quotes, at the risk of missing an important part of what was said, then having someone upset with me.) Well, you know, "stars" as you say are only human. They have families, their lives that we as "fans" are not a part of. They should not be "expected" to give up personal time for us because they don't "owe" us a thing. Sure we buy the albums, we go to the concerts, but they aren't forcing us to do that. We all have good days and bad, and they shouldn't be expected to be any better than us.... After all, they, as entertainers are just like the rest of us.... Human!!! :) Thanks for letting me put in my $.02 ($.50?!) worth!! I promise not to be so winded next time! Angi ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 19:26:11 -0500 (EST) From: James R Noble <noblejr@wilkes1.wilkes.edu> Subject: Bass questions I have been a bass player for three and a half years, and most of what I practice learn and play is..you guessed it, RUSH songs. (I can play original stuff and other groups, but for now..) Anyway, I just bought a brand new Rickenbacker 4003 bass guitar, and I love it. Yes, this is the same bass that Geddy played from FBN to about GUP. I'm not that smart as far as EQ and amplifiers go, so can anyone help me get my Rickenbacker's sound to approximate the tone that Geddy got out of his? I own a Crate B-60 watt amp. Any info on how he EQ'd his bass would be appreciated. My E-mail address is "noblejr@wilkes1.wilkes.edu" Thanks! By the way, CP is the best album yet, especially that Fender Jazz that Ged is playing again! -Jim Noble from Wilkes University, Pennsylvania. (ps-Any good Rush guitarists out there? Drop me a line if you are in northern NJ, or north-eastern PA..I can play about 40 different Rush tunes on bass and some on keyboards..) ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 21:51:42 -0500 (EST) From: Anthony Hahn u <hahn8320@mach1.wlu.ca> Subject: In one of the previous issues, someone wanted to know how I could say that a certain band/artist was not something that "typical Rush fans" would like. To refresh everyone's memory, that artist was Kim Mitchell. I derived my conclusions from the facts that most Rush fans I know are fans of such bands as Yes, ELP, King Crimson, etc. etc. And, they go on to make fun of Kim Mitchell, classifying him as simple, infantile and basically without substance. I agree that most Rush fans have very wide tastes. My other two favorite artists are Alice in Chains and Neil Young. However, I think if you were to listen to Kim Mitchell, many Rush fans would think of him as ridiculous. Can anyone else who is familiar with Kim Mitchell comment? I also think it's ludicrous to mention a band that one supposes most Rush fans would not like, and then to carve up that person by saying that Rush fans are very open-minded in musical taste. How many of us here enjoy listening to music such as C + C Music Factory, etc.? I don't think many. There are a number of other bands that could be mentioned that fall into this category, and I think that most (if not all) of us could agree on bands that collectively we as Rush fans dislike. Tony hahn8320@mach1.wlu.ca ---------------------------------------------------------- From: Michael Joseph De Cresenzo <decrem@rpi.edu> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 14:44:59 -0500 Subject: Re: NMS#1036 I'm writing in response to this letter: Dear Rush-ites, I recently ordered a poster from Ludwig, out of Modern Drummer magazine. It is a picture of Neil sitting inside his CP drumset. I see that he only has one bass drum. I thought he has always had two of them, and Rush didn't come to Seattle this year :(. So could someone tell me if Neil is using one bass or two, and if one, why. Thank you. -Arvid Hokanson Neil has been using one bass drum for a couple of years. He uses a Yamaha double pedal in place of the second bass drum. This is all in much more detail in the February 94 issue of Modern Drummer. (with Neil Peart on the cover) Hope that this could help... ...Mike D ---------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 13:09:41 -0700 (MST) From: Anthony J Zimmermann <anthonyz@gas.uug.arizona.edu> Subject: AZ Rush fans rejoice! How many NMS'ers would be interested in seeing a good cover band in Arizona? Our trio played 3 1/2 hours of Rush material at our practice on Sunday. Phoenix will be our most likely gigs, Tucson 2nd, then Flagstaff. Respond private email <anthonyz@gas.uug.arizona.edu> Later, Tony Z. ---------------------------------------------------------- From: dlemay@emr.ca (Doug Lemay) Subject: Mobil Fidelity Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 16:23:32 -0500 (EST) Hello NMS'ers I'll be brief, Please ignore this post RUSH-MGR if someone has already provided this. The email address for Mobil Fidelity Sound Labs is: mofi@mofi.com That's it, Thanks Doug ---------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Favorite Alex solos From: BARNETTE@afc4a.safb.af.mil (Barnette, Gary V 1Lt) Date: 13 Dec 94 17:00:42 EST Greetings, fellow RUSH fans. Dennis Pupello wanted to know what some of us deemed as great guitar solos from Alex. One of my absolute all-time favorites is the solo in "Limelight". The way the guitar notes and Geddy's base line mesh here still gives me goose bumps even today when I listen to it. Other great Alex solos are in: Marathon Ghost of a Chance Distant Early Warning YYZ How about favorite baselines from Geddy? Although there are many, the first one that comes to my mind is the breakdown in "Show Don't Tell"...INCREDIBLE! Later... Gary ----------------------------------------------------------
To submit material to The National Midnight Star, send mail to: rush@syrinx.umd.edu For administrative matters (subscription, unsubscription, changes, and questions), send mail to: rush-request@syrinx.umd.edu or rush-mgr@syrinx.umd.edu There is now anonymous ftp access available on Syrinx. The network address to ftp to is: syrinx.umd.edu or 129.2.8.114 When you've connected, userid is "anonymous", password is <your userid>. Once you've successfully logged on, change directory (cd) to 'rush'. There is also a mail server available (for those unable or unwilling to ftp). For more info, send email with the subject line of HELP to: server@ingr.com These requests are processed nightly. Use a subject line of MESSAGE to send a note to the server keeper or to deposit a file into the archive. Gopher access is now available on syrinx! Use this command to access the gopher: gopher syrinx.umd.edu 2112 For those of you on the World Wide Web, there is now a Rush home page at: http://www.cerf.net/rush.html The contents of The National Midnight Star are solely the opinions and comments of the individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the authors' management, or the mailing list management. Copyright (C) 1994 by The Rush Fans Mailing List Editor, The National Midnight Star (Rush Fans Mailing List) ********************************************* End of The National Midnight Star Number 1040 *********************************************